← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Olitch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Crowsnest Pass Timberwolves AJHL 52 5 9 14 0.269 0.0903 0.0971 0.2491 0.2680
2003-04 Fernie Ghostriders NAHL 51 24 16 40 0.784 0.2882 0.2973 0.8278 0.8539
2004-05 Helena Bighorns NAHL 55 17 17 34 0.618 0.2271 0.2230 0.6525 0.6406
2005-06 Helena Bighorns NAHL 58 16 30 46 0.793 0.2914 0.2716 0.8371 0.7803
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 26 21 21 42 1.615
2008-09 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 27 24 20 44 1.630
2007-08 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 25 9 8 17 0.680
2006-07 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 28 18 14 32 1.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.14
2006-07 · Wentworth
+429.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16454
Forward overall
#530
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.