← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-26 Country: USA
2011 · Round 7, Pick #198  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 41 2 6 8 0.195 0.1151 0.1031 0.5860 0.5249
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2024-25 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2023-24 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2022-23 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2021-22 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2020-21 Villanova University ACHA_D1 25 3 3 6 0.240
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC SR 30 0 3 3 0.100
2015-16 Miami D1 NCHC JR 15 1 0 1 0.067
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2012-13 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 32 0 1 1 0.031

NCAAe Rankings

#14245
Defenseman overall
#1569
Defenseman born in 1993
#3641
in USHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2018-19
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.