IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Jensen

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chanhassen USHS-MN 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0425 0.0425 0.0384 0.0384
2022-23 Chanhassen USHS-MN 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0311 0.0311 0.0280 0.0280
2023-24 Chanhassen USHS-MN 31 2 5 7 0.226 0.0608 0.0608 0.0548 0.0548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 24 13 16 29 1.208
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 7 7 14 0.538
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 28 6 10 16 0.571

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57997
Forward overall
#6043
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Gaudry
Castleton · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Viola
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Thornton
Castleton · 2010-11
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.