IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Gaudry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-10-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Dauphin Kings MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Dauphin Kings MJHL 48 2 10 12 0.250 0.0680 0.0716 0.1575 0.1658
2010-11 — MJHL 64 7 29 36 0.562 0.1529 0.1535 0.3545 0.3559
2011-12 — MJHL 45 2 7 9 0.200 0.0544 0.0519 0.1260 0.1201
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 15 0 4 4 0.267
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 18 3 1 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2012-13 · Castleton
+154.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18874
Defenseman overall
#1770
Defenseman born in 1991
#1639
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Wiest
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Riesgraf
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.