IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bunz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Chicago Steel USHL 41 3 4 7 0.171 0.1007 0.1004 0.5127 0.5111
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.1475 0.1398 0.7509 0.7117
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 18 0 3 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Wisconsin
+42.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12593
Defenseman overall
#1673
Defenseman born in 1995
#3483
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Evans
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.950 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Panet
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Silverman
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.