IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Cecconi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-23 Country: USA
2015 · Round 5, Pick #133  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 28 2 4 6 0.214 0.1264 0.1395 0.6436 0.7102
2014-15 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 60 3 14 17 0.283 0.1671 0.1762 0.8509 0.8972
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 36 3 17 20 0.556
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 40 5 22 27 0.675
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 33 1 7 8 0.242
2015-16 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 38 0 7 7 0.184
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Michigan
+20.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.