IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 28 6 3 9 0.321 0.2389 0.2436 1.1993 1.2228
2014-15 Fargo Force USHL 58 15 20 35 0.603 0.3559 0.3739 1.8123 1.9042
2015-16 — USHL 36 9 11 20 0.556 0.3277 0.3291 1.6687 1.6758
2016-17 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 56 12 16 28 0.500 0.2949 0.2811 1.5017 1.4315
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 33 5 1 6 0.182
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 22 2 2 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · Michigan State
-29.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13392
Forward overall
#595
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2016-17
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hill
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.