← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Robert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 59 4 10 14 0.237 0.0872 0.0933 0.2505 0.2682
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 38 0 3 3 0.079 0.0465 0.0458 0.2370 0.2334
2014-15 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 55 1 2 3 0.054 0.0321 0.0300 0.1637 0.1532
2015-16 USHL 55 2 8 10 0.182 0.1072 0.0953 0.5460 0.4856
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA 36 2 9 11 0.306
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA 38 0 10 10 0.263
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA 26 1 3 4 0.154
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2016-17 · Robert Morris
-4.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21800
Defenseman overall
#2363
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.