| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Soo Eagles | NAHL | 59 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.237 | 0.0872 | 0.0933 | 0.2505 | 0.2682 |
| 2013-14 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 38 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.079 | 0.0465 | 0.0458 | 0.2370 | 0.2334 |
| 2014-15 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 55 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.054 | 0.0321 | 0.0300 | 0.1637 | 0.1532 |
| 2015-16 | — | USHL | 55 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.182 | 0.1072 | 0.0953 | 0.5460 | 0.4856 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Robert Morris | D1 | AHA | — | 36 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.306 |
| 2018-19 | Robert Morris | D1 | AHA | — | 38 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2017-18 | Robert Morris | D1 | AHA | — | 26 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.154 |
| 2016-17 | Robert Morris | D1 | AHA | — | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.