← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.5899 0.6544 3.0034 3.3317
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2949 0.3126 1.5017 1.5920
2015-16 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 7 26 33 0.550 0.3244 0.3288 1.6519 1.6745
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 33 2 7 9 0.273
2018-19 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 29 1 5 6 0.207
2017-18 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 37 5 12 17 0.460
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 40 1 12 13 0.325
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Boston College
+6.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2575
Defenseman overall
#577
Defenseman born in 1997
#1211
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.