| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 50 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.120 | 0.0708 | 0.0737 | 0.3604 | 0.3750 |
| 2015-16 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 55 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.109 | 0.0644 | 0.0640 | 0.3277 | 0.3258 |
| 2016-17 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 57 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.158 | 0.0931 | 0.0878 | 0.4742 | 0.4472 |
| 2017-18 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 50 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.180 | 0.1062 | 0.0949 | 0.5406 | 0.4830 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2020-21 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | JR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | SO | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2018-19 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.