← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Alvaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Oakville Blades OJHL 55 14 13 27 0.491 0.1203 0.1350 0.3380 0.3794
2013-14 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 51 16 24 40 0.784 0.1922 0.2059 0.5400 0.5785
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 10 23 33 0.569 0.3357 0.3393 1.7089 1.7270
2015-16 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 11 19 30 0.500 0.2949 0.2843 1.5017 1.4479
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 34 2 9 11 0.324
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 30 3 6 9 0.300
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 28 5 13 18 0.643
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 31 8 5 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Vermont
+60.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15696
Forward overall
#613
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.