IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Gottlieb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 50 4 21 25 0.500 0.1677 0.1689 0.4627 0.4660
2014-15 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 58 6 15 21 0.362 0.2136 0.2005 1.0875 1.0206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Brown D1 ECAC SR 34 5 11 16 0.471
2017-18 Brown D1 ECAC JR 29 3 12 15 0.517
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC SO 24 0 8 8 0.333
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC FR 31 2 19 21 0.677
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2015-16 · Brown
+282.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6922
Defenseman overall
#1116
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Sleeth
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Russell
Assumption · 2023-24
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.