Adam Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-17 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	—	NTDP-U18	54	4	23	27	0.500	0.3716	0.3760	1.8586	1.8807
2015-16	—	NTDP-U18	64	9	50	59	0.922	0.6852	0.6612	3.4270	3.3068

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Harvard	D1	ECAC	JR	33	9	39	48	1.454
2017-18	Harvard	D1	ECAC	SO	29	6	22	28	0.966
2016-17	Harvard	D1	ECAC	FR	35	6	34	40	1.143

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.56

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.14

2016-17 · Harvard

+103.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG

→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)

0.54 Strong D

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.