IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke McElhenie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Madison Capitols USHL 57 7 6 13 0.228 0.1346 0.1258 0.6720 0.6283
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 60 14 13 27 0.450 0.2655 0.2359 1.3258 1.1779
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 28 17 18 35 1.250
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 17 18 35 1.250
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen JR 30 10 15 25 0.833
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 30 10 15 25 0.833
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 30 14 10 24 0.800
2016-17 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25084
Forward overall
#967
Forward born in 1995
#2447
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Yann Poirier
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kai Tsoar
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.