← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hank Crone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 54 2 9 11 0.204 0.1202 0.1312 0.6118 0.6679
2015-16 USHL 62 17 24 41 0.661 0.3901 0.4077 1.9861 2.0758
2016-17 Fargo Force USHL 56 24 38 62 1.107 0.6531 0.6493 3.3251 3.3056
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 60 19 46 65 1.083 0.6390 0.5706 3.2536 2.9052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 32 13 31 44 1.375
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC JR 13 5 4 9 0.692
2019-20 Denver D1 NCHC SO 31 6 10 16 0.516
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 35 2 10 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2017-18 · Boston University
-33.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3895
Forward overall
#192
Forward born in 1998
#124
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.