IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Berkovitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-16 Country: USA
2014 · Round 4, Pick #123  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USHL 43 0 4 4 0.093 0.0549 0.0544 0.2793 0.2768
2015-16 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 52 2 8 10 0.192 0.1134 0.1071 0.5776 0.5457
2016-17 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 53 2 23 25 0.472 0.2783 0.2487 1.4167 1.2661
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2019-20 Army D1 AHA JR 27 1 4 5 0.185
2018-19 Army D1 AHA SO 39 1 9 10 0.256
2017-18 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8001
Defenseman overall
#1314
Defenseman born in 1996
#2906
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Ruiz
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.