IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bresser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 40 1 2 3 0.075 0.0442 0.0432 0.2253 0.2202
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 8 14 22 0.440 0.1617 0.1561 0.4644 0.4482
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SR 28 16 17 33 1.179
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 28 16 17 33 1.179
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 28 4 17 21 0.750
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 28 4 17 21 0.750
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 25 9 8 17 0.680
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 11 1 2 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+187.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42073
Forward overall
#1785
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Stroh
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Zuccarini
Trinity · 2014-15
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braxton Powers
University of New England · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.