IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-24 Country: USA
2015 · Round 7, Pick #195  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mahtomedi High USHS-MN 23 22 25 47 2.043 0.2587 0.2496 1.5017 1.5900
2015-16 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 8 14 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2265 1.1392 1.1532
2016-17 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 49 16 12 28 0.571 0.3371 0.3240 1.7161 1.6497
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 35 8 16 24 0.686
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 32 8 4 12 0.375
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 36 6 9 15 0.417
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 33 8 7 15 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2017-18 · Michigan
+86.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11548
Forward overall
#518
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Spagnuolo
Adrian · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.