IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wayzata High USHS-MN 23 6 11 17 0.739 0.0936 0.0881 — —
2015-16 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 54 6 14 20 0.370 0.2185 0.2160 1.1125 1.0997
2016-17 — USHL 57 6 19 25 0.439 0.2587 0.2425 1.3173 1.2349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 17 0 3 3 0.176
2019-20 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 20 2 1 3 0.150
2018-19 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 35 1 10 11 0.314
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4936
Defenseman overall
#1035
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Unger
Keene State · 2023-24
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.