← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Bunz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 9 18 27 0.551 0.2123 0.2210 0.8019 0.8349
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 19 2 7 9 0.474 0.2794 0.2714 1.4227 1.3821
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast GR 38 0 5 5 0.132
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 42 0 5 5 0.119
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2017-18 · Providence
-56.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4378
Defenseman overall
#1001
Defenseman born in 1998
#2027
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.