← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-15 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Lausitzer Füchse · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Janesville Jets NAHL 36 2 5 7 0.194 0.0714 0.0780 0.2052 0.2241
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 56 28 30 58 1.036 0.3805 0.3956 1.0932 1.1365
2015-16 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 31 5 16 21 0.677 0.3996 0.3841 2.0345 1.9554
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 15 30 45 0.776 0.4577 0.4165 2.3303 2.1208
2023-24 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 1 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 25 5 7 12 0.480
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 18 1 10 11 0.611
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Northeastern
-49.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7486
Forward overall
#340
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.