IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Peski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 57 6 20 26 0.456 0.0989 0.1095 0.3529 0.3908
2014-15 Brockville Braves CCHL 57 6 36 42 0.737 0.1598 0.1696 0.5701 0.6051
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 2 16 18 0.305 0.1800 0.1796 0.9163 0.9144
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 35 1 9 10 0.286
2018-19 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 27 2 1 3 0.111
2017-18 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 34 1 4 5 0.147
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 29 0 3 3 0.103
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · North Dakota
-37.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7267
Defenseman overall
#1352
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Brown
Amherst · 2010-11
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Norris
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2020-21
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Darren McCormick
SUNY Cortland · 2011-12
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.