← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Norris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Warroad USHS-MN 31 5 34 39 1.258 0.3387 0.3387 0.3056 0.3056
2020-21 Warroad USHS-MN 20 12 33 45 2.250 0.6057 0.6057 0.5465 0.5465
2021-22 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 25 0 9 9 0.360 0.1040 0.1079 0.2710 0.2811
2022-23 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 56 3 27 30 0.536 0.1548 0.1528 0.4033 0.3981
2023-24 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 2 14 16 0.271 0.1007 0.0954 0.2871 0.2720
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 26 0 3 3 0.115
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 22 4 5 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+266.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9963
Defenseman overall
#1625
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.