IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Dhooghe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 20 10 30 0.556 0.4130 0.4203 2.0732 2.1098
2016-17 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 65 18 20 38 0.585 0.4345 0.4208 2.1814 2.1128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 NCHC GR 34 4 10 14 0.412
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 20 2 2 4 0.200
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 28 5 9 14 0.500
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 37 15 11 26 0.703
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 37 6 10 16 0.432
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2017-18 · Wisconsin
+20.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13778
Forward overall
#630
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Stevens
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.