← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Hausinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-12-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 59 7 24 31 0.525 0.2082 0.2215 0.5516 0.5868
2015-16 USHL 54 0 3 3 0.056 0.0342 0.0337 0.1638 0.1614
2016-17 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 51 7 13 20 0.392 0.1554 0.1500 0.4118 0.3975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SR 10 3 3 6 0.600
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 10 3 3 6 0.600
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen JR 29 10 26 36 1.241
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 29 10 26 36 1.241
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 28 2 14 16 0.571
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 2 14 16 0.571
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 1 12 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+358.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12999
Defenseman overall
#1798
Defenseman born in 1996
#4402
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.