← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Jukurit · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Anoka High USHS-MN 23 9 16 25 1.087 0.1376 0.1437 0.2640 0.2757
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.2949 0.3219 1.5017 1.6393
2016-17 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 47 14 14 28 0.596 0.3514 0.3656 1.7891 1.8616
2017-18 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 17 31 48 0.706 0.3434 0.3381 1.7321 1.7053
2018-19 Tri-City Americans WHL 31 12 20 32 1.032 0.5022 0.4700 2.5330 2.3708
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild WHL 62 28 45 73 1.177 0.5728 0.5728 2.8890 2.8890
2024-25 Jukurit Liiga 7 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5825
Forward overall
#245
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.