IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 24 2 0 2 0.083 0.0330 0.0363 0.0875 0.0964
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 20 22 42 0.778 0.3082 0.3232 0.8166 0.8564
2015-16 — NAHL 52 25 27 52 1.000 0.3962 0.3980 0.9820 0.9528
2016-17 Chicago Steel USHL 41 16 13 29 0.707 0.4348 0.3997 2.0838 1.9156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 — GR 23 6 7 13 0.565
2020-21 Arizona State D1 — SR 16 4 10 14 0.875
2019-20 Arizona State D1 — JR 36 20 18 38 1.056
2018-19 Arizona State D1 — SO 32 23 11 34 1.062
2017-18 Arizona State D1 — FR 32 17 7 24 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2017-18 · Arizona State
+119.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9100
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Schoner
Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.