← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 24 2 0 2 0.083 0.0306 0.0337 0.0879 0.0968
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 20 22 42 0.778 0.2858 0.2997 0.8210 0.8611
2015-16 NAHL 52 25 27 52 1.000 0.3674 0.3691 1.0010 0.9713
2016-17 Chicago Steel USHL 41 16 13 29 0.707 0.4172 0.3835 2.1243 1.9528
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 NCHC GR 23 6 7 13 0.565
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 16 4 10 14 0.875
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 36 20 18 38 1.056
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 32 23 11 34 1.062
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 32 17 7 24 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2017-18 · Arizona State
+132.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9410
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.