| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 24 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.083 | 0.0306 | 0.0337 | 0.0879 | 0.0968 |
| 2014-15 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 54 | 20 | 22 | 42 | 0.778 | 0.2858 | 0.2997 | 0.8210 | 0.8611 |
| 2015-16 | — | NAHL | 52 | 25 | 27 | 52 | 1.000 | 0.3674 | 0.3691 | 1.0010 | 0.9713 |
| 2016-17 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 41 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 0.707 | 0.4172 | 0.3835 | 2.1243 | 1.9528 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | GR | 23 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.565 |
| 2020-21 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | SR | 16 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.875 |
| 2019-20 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | JR | 36 | 20 | 18 | 38 | 1.056 |
| 2018-19 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | SO | 32 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 1.062 |
| 2017-18 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | FR | 32 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.