| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.1537 | 0.1643 | 0.7366 | 0.7875 |
| 2016-17 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 52 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 0.308 | 0.1891 | 0.1925 | 0.9065 | 0.9229 |
| 2017-18 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 59 | 26 | 20 | 46 | 0.780 | 0.4793 | 0.4642 | 2.2972 | 2.2247 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | — | 36 | 11 | 20 | 31 | 0.861 |
| 2021-22 | Miami | D1 | NCHC | — | 21 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.905 |
| 2020-21 | Merrimack | D1 | — | JR | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.500 |
| 2019-20 | Merrimack | D1 | — | SO | 28 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 0.786 |
| 2018-19 | Merrimack | D1 | — | FR | 34 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.706 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.