IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Vold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Andover High USHS-MN 25 15 17 32 1.280 0.1620 0.1498 0.3109 0.2874
2015-16 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 58 2 24 26 0.448 0.1647 0.1657 — —
2016-17 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 59 6 30 36 0.610 0.2242 0.2134 0.6441 0.6130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 29 1 9 10 0.345
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 37 2 6 8 0.216
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 30 4 0 4 0.133
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4663
Defenseman overall
#870
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Karty
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kurtis Astle
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.