← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Kelleher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 11 21 32 0.865 0.2428 0.2650 0.7111 0.7762
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 17 36 53 1.395 0.3915 0.4082 1.1467 1.1955
2016-17 USHL 61 17 34 51 0.836 0.4932 0.4647 2.5111 2.3658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 13 0 4 4 0.308
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 29 6 17 23 0.793
2018-19 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 30 3 18 21 0.700
2017-18 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 34 4 15 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2017-18 · New Hampshire
+47.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8632
Forward overall
#403
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.