IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Ford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 52 9 11 20 0.385 0.2364 0.2346 1.1331 1.1243
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 37 4 24 28 0.757
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 31 16 12 28 0.903
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 36 12 22 34 0.944
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 40 17 17 34 0.850
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 41 8 10 18 0.439
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2017-18 · Bowling Green
+118.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22899
Forward overall
#1097
Forward born in 1998
#2277
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Duhamel
Norwich · 2003-04
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Cook
Babson · 2001-02
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2019-20
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.