← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Hurley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 25 4 16 20 0.800 0.1013 0.1027 0.1943 0.1970
2015-16 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 53 4 16 20 0.377 0.1387 0.1519 0.3983 0.4363
2016-17 Fargo Force USHL 40 4 7 11 0.275 0.1622 0.1639 0.8259 0.8343
2017-18 USHL 58 7 12 19 0.328 0.1933 0.1857 0.9839 0.9450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC 24 2 4 6 0.250
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC 20 1 2 3 0.150
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC 28 3 12 15 0.536
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC 24 1 6 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Clarkson
+74.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8195
Defenseman overall
#1576
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.