← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Schmidt-Svejstrup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-14 Country: Denmark
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 17 13 30 0.857 0.2406 0.2622 0.7047 0.7679
2016-17 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.1424 0.1409 0.7250 0.7172
2017-18 Fargo Force USHL 40 26 17 43 1.075 0.6341 0.5958 3.2287 3.0336
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC 37 9 13 22 0.595
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 28 4 8 12 0.429
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 11 3 6 9 0.818
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 9 9 18 0.545
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 6 8 14 0.424
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2018-19 · Maine
+19.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7533
Forward overall
#342
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.