IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Krygier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-05 Country: USA
2018 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #201  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 37 3 3 6 0.162 0.0997 0.1101 0.4779 0.5278
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 3 14 17 0.293 0.1802 0.1901 0.8635 0.9109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen — 38 10 6 16 0.421
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen — 35 4 7 11 0.314
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen — 25 2 1 3 0.120
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 25 2 1 3 0.120
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen — 36 3 3 6 0.167
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 36 3 3 6 0.167
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen — 26 1 4 5 0.192
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 26 1 4 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · Michigan
+28.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2007-08
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.