← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Krygier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-05 Country: USA
2018 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 50 2 3 5 0.100 0.0590 0.0652 0.3003 0.3317
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 48 0 8 8 0.167 0.0983 0.1037 0.5007 0.5282
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Michigan State D1 BigTen 28 1 3 4 0.143
2021-22 Michigan State D1 BigTen 36 2 6 8 0.222
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 26 1 2 3 0.115
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 35 0 3 3 0.086
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 33 0 2 2 0.061
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2018-19 · Michigan State
-27.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22972
Defenseman overall
#3294
Defenseman born in 2000
#4093
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2000-01
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2007-08
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.