IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 19 15 21 36 1.895 0.6050 0.6362 1.4667 1.5424
2001-02 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 20 23 43 0.796 0.2543 0.2556 0.6164 0.6196
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 New England D3 — SR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 New England D3 — JR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2012-13 New England D3 — SO 25 0 5 5 0.200
2011-12 New England D3 — FR 25 3 4 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2011-12 · New England
-19.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8854
Forward overall
#320
Forward born in 1983
#82
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2003-04
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.