IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 19 15 21 36 1.895 0.4110 0.4322 1.4659 1.5416
2001-02 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 20 23 43 0.796 0.1727 0.1736 0.6161 0.6193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 University of New England D3 CNE SR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 University of New England D3 CNE JR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2012-13 University of New England D3 CNE SO 25 0 5 5 0.200
2011-12 University of New England D3 CNE FR 25 3 4 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2011-12 · University of New England
+18.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9320
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 1983
#69
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Stark
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Stacho
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.900 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.