IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Stacho Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-28 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 14 27 41 0.683 0.2427 0.2522 0.7174 0.7454
2018-19 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 48 17 34 51 1.062 0.3774 0.3752 1.1155 1.1091
2019-20 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 42 10 25 35 0.833 0.2960 0.2960 0.8749 0.8749
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 29 20 24 44 1.517
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 23 14 11 25 1.087
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 30 10 17 27 0.900
2020-21 American International D1 AHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11933
Forward overall
#535
Forward born in 1999
#393
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.