| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 39 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.205 | 0.0813 | 0.0870 | 0.2153 | 0.2303 |
| 2005-06 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 45 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.422 | 0.1673 | 0.1707 | 0.4433 | 0.4523 |
| 2006-07 | — | NAHL | 53 | 7 | 20 | 27 | 0.509 | 0.2018 | 0.1959 | 0.5348 | 0.5193 |
| 2007-08 | Traverse City North Stars | NAHL | 48 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 0.375 | 0.1486 | 0.1370 | 0.3937 | 0.3629 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | JR | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 |
| 2009-10 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | SO | 22 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.727 |
| 2008-09 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | FR | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.