IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Harrison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-04-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Texas Tornado NAHL 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.1002 0.1074 0.2878 0.3086
2005-06 Texas Tornado NAHL 52 19 14 33 0.635 0.2332 0.2385 0.6698 0.6850
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 59 11 12 23 0.390 0.1432 0.1394 0.4114 0.4005
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 48 20 19 39 0.812 0.2985 0.2759 0.8576 0.7927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 25 2 2 4 0.160
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 22 4 3 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2008-09 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+68.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20648
Forward overall
#686
Forward born in 1987
#1405
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Coleman Jenkins
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.