IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan DeStefani Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1232 0.6007 0.6269
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 53 14 17 31 0.585 0.2149 0.2203 0.6174 0.6330
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 50 14 22 36 0.720 0.2645 0.2645 0.7600 0.7600
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 21 5 8 13 0.619
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30687
Forward overall
#1627
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Barkwell
Adrian · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Yim
Adrian · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.