IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Wallgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 56 13 13 26 0.464 0.1706 0.1700 0.4901 0.4883
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 62 13 27 40 0.645 0.2370 0.2245 0.6810 0.6449
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 25 8 10 18 0.720
2009-10 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 25 2 14 16 0.640
2008-09 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 24 7 11 18 0.750
2007-08 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2007-08 · Saint John's
+198.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24035
Forward overall
#813
Forward born in 1986
#1852
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Kerchoff
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Markell
SUNY Cortland · 2006-07
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rhett Evjen
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.