IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austun Tavis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 5 14 19 0.333 0.1225 0.1210 0.3518 0.3476
2006-07 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 43 4 7 11 0.256 0.0940 0.0882 0.2700 0.2535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 28 6 2 8 0.286
2009-10 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2008-09 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 23 2 4 6 0.261
2007-08 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 26 3 1 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2007-08 · Hamline
+77.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43548
Forward overall
#1405
Forward born in 1986
#4790
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McAleer
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rich Dady
Fitchburg State · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.