IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0516 0.0532 0.1425 0.1469
2005-06 Billings Bulls NAHL 51 7 11 18 0.353 0.1254 0.1239 0.3705 0.3659
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 20 4 6 10 0.500 0.1776 0.1667 0.5250 0.4927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Air Force D1 AHA SR 12 2 2 4 0.333
2009-10 Air Force D1 AHA JR 31 1 7 8 0.258
2009-10 Lebanon Valley D3 — SO 22 1 3 4 0.182
2008-09 Air Force D1 AHA SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Lebanon Valley D3 — FR 25 6 3 9 0.360
2007-08 Air Force D1 AHA FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2007-08 · Air Force
+73.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37286
Forward overall
#1170
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Kroon
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Flynn
Babson · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Horan
Williams · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.