IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jameson Raymond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 44 5 5 10 0.227 0.0901 0.0917 0.2386 0.2428
2006-07 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 57 5 27 32 0.561 0.2224 0.2154 0.5894 0.5709
2007-08 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 56 3 21 24 0.429 0.1698 0.1561 0.4500 0.4137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 28 3 16 19 0.679
2010-11 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 27 6 10 16 0.593
2009-10 Lawrence D3 — SO 28 5 17 22 0.786
2008-09 Lawrence D3 — FR 28 4 12 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2008-09 · Lawrence
+236.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8944
Defenseman overall
#1059
Defenseman born in 1987
#3265
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Bulawka
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.