IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Callahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-23 Country: USA
2018 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #142  ·  Utah Mammoth Utah Mammoth (via ARI)
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 — USHL 59 3 15 18 0.305 0.1875 0.1920 0.8989 0.9205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 38 3 11 14 0.368
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 25 3 11 14 0.560
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 34 5 23 28 0.824
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 41 2 8 10 0.244
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2018-19 · Providence
+34.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2007-08
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Janke
Norwich · 2007-08
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.