IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Korey O'Brien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 — NAHL 42 2 7 9 0.214 0.0787 0.0774 0.2262 0.2226
2006-07 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0510 0.0477 0.1466 0.1371
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 21 3 5 8 0.381
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22567
Defenseman overall
#1741
Defenseman born in 1986
#6206
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Gallagher
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Hansen
Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Doug Carr
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.