IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Nordenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-05 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0555 0.0581 0.1331 0.1394
2004-05 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 34 5 11 16 0.471 0.2613 0.2609 0.6265 0.6255
2005-06 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 36 10 11 21 0.583 0.2302 0.2176 0.8036 0.7597
2006-07 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 48 20 23 43 0.896 0.3291 0.3047 0.9468 0.8767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 0 2 2 0.500
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2007-08 · Manhattanville
-3.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14753
Forward overall
#502
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dennis Zak
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Krupcyznski
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.