IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Samuelsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 4 20 24 0.387 0.2877 0.2825 1.4444 1.4184
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 33 1 8 9 0.273 0.1609 0.1625 0.8190 0.8269
2019-20 Sudbury Wolves OHL 43 3 14 17 0.395 0.2287 0.2287 1.0157 1.0157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4532
Defenseman overall
#982
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jered Stevenson
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pavit Mehra
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Morgan
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
1.517 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.