← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 39 9 12 21 0.538 0.1978 0.2066 0.5684 0.5936
2019-20 NAHL 50 17 28 45 0.900 0.3307 0.3307 0.9500 0.9500
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 44 13 26 39 0.886 0.3257 0.3257 0.9356 0.9356
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 29 15 20 35 1.207
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 27 10 24 34 1.259
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 23 13 13 26 1.130
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 29 19 25 44 1.517
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.52
2021-22 · SUNY Geneseo
+758.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13818
Forward overall
#589
Forward born in 2000
#578
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2021-22
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2006-07
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.