IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Heineman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 45 2 8 10 0.222 0.0816 0.0906 0.2345 0.2603
2007-08 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 56 3 5 8 0.143 0.0525 0.0557 0.1508 0.1600
2008-09 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 55 4 13 17 0.309 0.1136 0.1149 0.3263 0.3300
2009-10 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 21 4 10 14 0.667 0.2449 0.2378 0.7037 0.6834
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+22.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8601
Defenseman overall
#1182
Defenseman born in 1990
#3102
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Cowie
Neumann · 2010-11
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.